<aside> π―
Altcoinist delivers 59β162% better execution than leading competitors.
Based on 179 independent trades across 6 tokens, the 4 leading Telegram EVM bot competitors surrendered 59β162% more of your capital per trade compared to Altcoinist's smart routing powered by Definitive.fi.
With Altcoinist, you keep up to 4% more tokens per trade.
</aside>
<aside>
</aside>
<aside>
</aside>
<aside> π°
| Bot | Execution Score | How Much Worse | Extra Losses (36 trades) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ Altcoinist | 100 (Baseline) | β | β | β |
| π₯ BasedBot | 63 | 59% worse | +$99 | |
| π₯ Sigma | 54 | 86% worse | +$118 | |
| 4th - Maestro | 44β | 125% worseβ | +$140β | β Includes 1% deferred fee |
| 5th - Banana Gun | 38 | 162% worse | +$156 |
β Maestro figures include their 1% deferred fee adjustment. Raw execution (before fee) would score 78. See Fee Treatment section.
</aside>
<aside> π΅
| Your Volume | BasedBot | Sigma | Maestroβ | Banana |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | -$61 | -$89 | -$129 | -$167 |
| $50,000 | -$303 | -$445 | -$646 | -$836 |
| $100,000 | -$605 | -$889 | -$1,292 | -$1,672 |
| $500,000 | -$3,025 | -$4,445 | -$6,460 | -$8,360 |
| $1,000,000 | -$6,050 | -$8,890 | -$12,920 | -$16,720 |
β Maestro includes 1% deferred fee adjustment
<aside> πΉ
For active traders: If you trade $100K/month in volume, Altcoinist keeps $605-$1,672 more in your wallet compared to other bots.
</aside>
</aside>
<aside> π
Competitors leak more capital as trade size increases:
| Trade Size | Altcoinist Total Loss | BasedBot | Sigma | Banana Gun |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 ETH (~$30) | $0.26 | $0.50 (+$0.24 worse) | $0.84 (+$0.58 worse) | $0.81 (+$0.55 worse) |
| 0.05 ETH (~$150) | $2.21 | $3.40 (+$1.19 worse) | $2.87 (+$0.66 worse) | $5.16 (+$2.95 worse) |
| 0.2 ETH (~$600) | $8.15 | $13.27 (+$5.12 worse) | $15.57 (+$7.42 worse) | $18.59 (+$10.44 worse) |
Note: Maestro excluded from this table as their deferred fee model makes per-trade comparison at different sizes less meaningful.
<aside> πΉ
Key insight: On trades β₯0.05 ETH, competitor execution inefficiency compounds. At 0.2 ETH, competitors leak $5-$10+ more per trade than Altcoinist.
</aside>
</aside>
<aside> π§
| Bot | Avg. Speed | Execution Score | The Trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| BasedBot/Sigma | ~2 seconds β‘ | 54-63/100 | Lightning fast, capital inefficient |
| Altcoinist | ~9.8 seconds π― | 100/100 | 8 seconds = 59-162% better execution |
<aside> πΉ
The math is simple Competitors rush your trade to beat everyone else to the block. Smart routing takes a few extra seconds to find you the best price. This keeps hundreds or thousands more dollars in your wallet.
When speed matters: For time-critical arbitrage or pool sniping, faster bots exist. For everything else, Altcoinist keeps more of your capital working for you.
</aside>
</aside>
<aside> π
β Active daily traders - Savings compound dramatically at volume
β Large position traders - Execution quality advantage scales with trade size
β Dollar-cost averaging strategies - Consistent savings on regular buys
β Long-term holders - Better entry/exit prices = better returns
β MEV-sensitive traders - Lower slippage = less MEV extraction
β Not ideal for: Arbitrage traders, front-running strategies, pool snipers.
</aside>
<aside> π
<aside> π°
The result: More tokens, every single trade.
</aside>
</aside>
<aside> βοΈ
| Metric | Altcoinist | Competitor Range | How Much Worse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution Score | 100/100 | 38-63/100 | 59-162% worse |
| Total Losses | Baseline | $195-$252 | +$99-$156 worse |
| Large Trade Efficiency | Baseline | Leaks $5-$10+/trade | Scales with size |
Based on 180 independent trades. Full data available for verification.
Available here β Trading Bot Test Databases
</aside>